Thurso community Point of Delivery (PoD)

Pre-design consultation

A pre-design consultation was held in December 2025 and January 2026 to seek local views ahead of the project moving to the design stage. More than 500 people took part through a series of drop-in events and an online survey, building on earlier workshops with key partners and community groups.

In April 2026 we published the consultation engagement findings.These findings will now be used to inform the development of more detailed proposals for the site and the process for statutory consultation, which will take place in Autumn 2026.

The following information outlines the key issues you raised and how these are being taken forward as the project moves to the next stage.

The overall vision

You said:

  • The Thurso Community PoD must be more than just a replacement school
  • It should serve the whole community - children, young people, families, older residents, and visitors

We heard:

  • There is strong support for a shared civic facility, provided education remains central and protected
  • People want a place that feels open, welcoming and owned by the community, not just a school site

What this means next:

  • The PoD will be planned as education‑led, with carefully designed community access
  • Community use, accessibility, and affordability will be considered from the start, not added later

Education: getting the basics right

You said:

  • Quality of education is the single most important priority
  • Many people are concerned about very large campuses and mixing primary and secondary pupils
  • There is no single preferred school layout, but strong views about safety, scale and travel

We heard:

  • People value:
    • Safe, age‑appropriate environments
    • Clear school identity
    • Children being known and supported
  • Concerns were raised about:
    • Large sites becoming overwhelming
    • Traffic and drop‑off pressures
    • The experience of younger children on shared campuses

What this means next:

Any future education layout will need to:

  • Clearly protect children’s day‑to‑day experience
  • Demonstrate how pupils of different ages are kept safe and separate where needed
  • Show how design supports learning, wellbeing and belonging

Additional Support Needs (ASN), neurodiversity and disability

You said:

  • ASN and disability provision must be central, not an afterthought
  • Existing facilities do not always meet need
  • The design of spaces (layout, light, sound, dignity) really matters

We heard:

This was one of the strongest and most consistent themes in the consultation. People asked for:

  • Sensory and calm spaces
  • Changing Places facilities
  • Thoughtful acoustics and lighting
  • Respectful placement of ASN provision, avoiding stigma
  • Families also raised the importance of good transitions from school to adult services

What this means next:

  • Inclusive design principles will be built into early design stages
  • ASN users, families and professionals will be actively involved in shaping spaces
  • The PoD will consider both children and adults with additional needs, not just school provision

Sport and leisure

You said:

  • Thurso and Caithness lack indoor and all‑weather facilities, especially in winter
  • Clubs struggle with access, storage, affordability, and holiday closures
  • Key gaps include:
    • A large, multi‑court games hall
    • Gymnastics and dance spaces with sprung flooring
    • All‑weather pitches, including hockey
    • A 400m athletic track

We heard:

  • Sport and leisure is a top priority across all ages
  • There is concern that new provision could:
    • Replace or weaken existing facilities
    • Be too expensive for local clubs
    • Be unavailable outside school hours

What this means next:

  • Sport facilities will be planned for parallel school and community use
  • Affordability, storage, and club access will be key design considerations
  • New provision should complement, not undermine, existing facilities
  • Opportunities to stimulate community led activism and 3rd party funding

Arts, culture and community events

You said:

  • Thurso lacks a proper performance and events venue
  • The High School hall currently fills this gap, but this is fragile
  • Wick High School’s hall is often cited as an example of what not to repeat

We heard:

There is strong support for:

  • A performance space with a proper stage
  • Seating for 400+ people
  • Smaller bookable rooms for rehearsals, meetings and groups
  • Arts and culture are seen as vital to community identity and wellbeing

What this means next:

  • Options for a fit‑for‑purpose performance space will be explored early
  • Local arts and cultural groups will be directly involved in shaping requirements

Wellbeing, social space and young people

You said:

  • Thurso needs more safe, warm, non‑commercial spaces where people can meet
  • Teenagers need places to go that are not just sports‑based
  • Older people and carers face isolation, particularly in winter

We heard:

Clear demand for:

  • Community rooms and meeting spaces
  • Youth spaces designed with young people
  • Wellbeing and mental health support (with appropriate safeguards)
  • Cost and availability are as important as the buildings themselves

What this means next:

  • Community and wellbeing space will be treated as essential infrastructure
  • Spaces will be designed so school use and community use can co‑exist safely
  • Partnership working with UHI and third‑sector organisations will be explored

Links with UHI North, West and Hebrides

You said:

  • Stronger links with UHI could benefit older pupils and future pathways
  • There are also concerns about scale, safeguarding and age mix

We heard:

Support focuses on:

  • Wider subject choices
  • Smoother transitions after school
  • Helping young people stay local

Concerns focus on:

  • Safeguarding
  • Loss of focus on schools
  • Over - centralisation

What this means next:

  • Any closer links will focus primarily on secondary and post‑school learners
  • Safeguarding and access arrangements will be clearly designed and communicated

Accessibility, transport and location

You said:

  • Not everyone can drive or travel easily
  • Centralising everything risks excluding some people
  • Traffic and access at Ormlie Road is a serious concern

We heard:

  • Travel distance matters a lot for some people and less for others
  • Walking routes, public transport, and safe access are just as important as parking

What this means next:

  • Transport and access will be considered alongside building design
  • Options will be tested to ensure older residents, disabled users and families without cars are not disadvantaged

Trust, communication and what happens next

You said:

  • People want reassurance that engagement genuinely influences decisions
  • There is worry about repeating mistakes made elsewhere
  • There are concerns about what happens to existing buildings

We heard:

  • Trust depends on seeing clear evidence of impact, not just consultation
  • Many people still want clearer information on what a “PoD” actually means

What this means next:

Future updates will:

  • Show how feedback has shaped decisions
  • Be written in plain language
  • Explain next stages clearly and honestly
  • The future of existing buildings will be addressed openly as plans develop

Page last modified: 4 June 2026